Why do we engage in impression management?
1)Social approval (positive reinforcement); impression management is a means to an end:
2) Identity development: (developing a
sense of who we are)
Jellison and Gentry
- interview for employment: some Ss were told that the interviewer liked people
who agreed with him while others were told that the interviewer liked people
who disagreed with him. What do you suppose the interviewees did?
Researchers find that employees are sensitive to the point of view of
their employers when expressing opinions
Sex roles and social approval
- playing dumb; a social expectation for males and females - how many of you have ever played dumb?
Under what circumstances?
Have you ever pretended to be less intelligent
or knowledgeable than your: spouse, boss, coworkers, friends, strangers, children
Men 31% Women 23%
Findings: women are more likely to play
dumb with spouses whereas men are more likely to play dumb with bosses, coworkers,
strangers/ with children there is no difference; young people play dumb more
often than older people; more highly educated people play dumb more often than
less educated people; Jewish people
in achievement situations there are different expectations based on sex roles; theory - men and women conform
to traditional sex-role stereotypes because attractive others approve of such
conformity (implications: behaviors would change if expectations change)
Zanna & Pack (1975)
female Ss described themselves to either a highly attractive male with traditional
values or with non-traditional values or to an unattractive male with either
traditional or nontrad values; findings - for the attractive male the women
adjusted their descriptions to fit with his attitudes
In a second study, Zanna & Pack, the female Ss also had to complete
an intelligence scale; findings - for the traditional desirable male, the females
scored much lower on the test (18% lower)
Do men engage in the same type of impression management based on sex
role expectations? What is an expectation that we have for males?
Holmes (1971)
instructed one group of men to suck on a pacifier and another group to feel
sandpaper or cloth. After this experience, all of the men were asked to endure
electrical shocks. Which group was willing to endure greater amounts of shock?
Why? (To avoid the impression of being a baby)
Impression Management Strategies
Ingratiation
- influencing another's perception of our attractiveness; conforming, complimenting
Intimidation
- arousing fear
Self promotion - to be seen as competent
Exemplification
- to elicit perceptions of integrity or morality or to arouse guilt
Supplication
- advertising weaknesses, seeking sympathy
Behavioral matching
- acting like the person you are trying to impress
Conforming to situational norms
- situated identities (funeral - wearing somber clothes, etc.
self-promotion
- increasing one's own power, bragging, to be perceived as competent or good/ exemplification - strategy to elicit
perception of integrity and moral worthiness or to arouse guilt (playing the
martyr); supplication - advertising
weaknesses (playing dumb)
ingratiation
- influencing others' perception of our attractiveness by conforming, complimenting,
being submissive, paying attention to them ("yes" men) (obese people,
status relationships- ROTC cadets and officers)
intimidation
- strategy used to arouse fear in others
Self-schemas
- beliefs we have about ourselves; we are schematic on issues that are of interest
to us and we are always interested in things that affect us or objects, events,
and people who we affect. Self schema affect how we process information and
what we remember e.g. gender schema
Individual differences in impression management:
Self-Monitoring
- active attempt to control images and impressions give to others (Mark Snyder)
High self-monitors - concerned about the situational and interpersonal
appropriateness of his/her behavior; sensitive to cues as to the social appropriateness
of behavior; uses situational cues to control verbal and nonverbal self-presentation
Low self-monitors - expressive behavior controlled by internal affective
state and stable attitudes
Self-monitoring: High and low self- monitors
High self monitors are tuned into the social setting; they read and rely
on cues from the setting and from others to determine how they should behave;
goal- to promote smooth social interactions; actors, politicians, hosts. The
TO TELL THE TRUTH study
Low self- monitors - what you see is what you get; behavior is determined
by internal states; see themselves as principled; see high monitors as false
Machiavellianism
(Christie & Geis) - high need for power; avoid emotional attachment; respond
to elements in the situation that will produce the desirable results; control
the means of influencing others (opportunistic; manipulating)
Machiavellianism - the need for power; Christie and Geis - the MACH scale
self-seeking opportunists; modify their behavior in order to control
others
Self-Consciousness (self-awareness)
Private - focus on the self; greater self-knowledge
Public - Focus on how others see you; more
conforming to external demands