Self awareness

 

When you think about yourself, you are self-aware

 

2 Types of self-awareness: private and public; whether behavior is more influenced by personal standards or social standards is partially determined by what aspect of the self is salient (private or public)

 

                private – being aware of one’s hidden aspects of oneself

                                effects:

1)       intensification of affect – when we think about ourself in a particular feeling state that feeling state becomes exaggerated (when college males viewed nude photos, the one’s who were made more self-aware experienced greater positive affect than those who were not made self-aware – Schierer & Carver (1977))

2)       clarification of knowledge – private events become more distinct and the more accurate is the reporting on them. Placebo effects are lower in self-aware people (Gibbons et al. 1979)

3)       greater adherence to personal standards of behavior – Carver (1975) attitudes toward punishment were taken and 3 weeks later the Ss were given the opportunity to shock someone deserving of punishment – Ss who were made more self-aware were more likely to show attitude-behavior consistency

 

public – temporary state of being aware of one’s public self

                effects;

1)       evaluation apprehension – when we realize that we are the object of evaluation or scrutiny of others

2)       temporary loss of self-esteem – when we realize that there is a discrepancy between our ideal and actual public self  (seeing yourself on video)

3)       greater adherence to social standards of behavior

 

Self-esteem

 

Self-certainty – thinking that you know yourself – is crucial to self-esteem; self- esteem is determined by the way a person organizes positive and negative information about herself

                Showers (1992) people who organize their self- information into compartments based on positive and negative information have higher self-esteem and lower depression when the positive self -aspects are more frequently accessed. She also found that for persons for whom negative information is important and accessed, it is healthier to have a mix of positive and negative aspects rather than compartmentalization

 

Kernis (2006) the stability of high self esteem determines whether threats to self-esteem lead to hostility or aggression; When someone with unstable high self esteem has his esteem threatened, he is likely to become hostile - his/her implicit self esteem, of which he/she may not be consciously aware, is probably low.

 

Self-evaluation maintenance model ( Tesser, 1988) :

Social reflection - self esteem is reinforced by the outstanding accomplishments of others with whom one associates (my daughter the professor)

Social comparison – high self-esteem is maintained by downward comparison and threatened by upward comparison

Downward social comparison makes people with low self-esteem feel better about themselves.

 

Self-affirmation – people cope with specific threats by reminding themselves of other unrelated but cherished aspects of the self-concept (I may not be a good teacher; but I’m a good friend)