One cannot tell from this definition what kind of line is meant by "line," but later a "straight" line defined to be a special kind of line. One can conclude, then, that "lines" need not be straight. Perhaps "curve" would be a better translation than "line" since Euclid meant what is commonly called a curve in modern English, where a curve may or may not be straight.
Also, from the next definition, it is apparent that Euclid's lines may have ends, so they are "line segments" or "curve segments." But they need not have ends in all cases since the entire circumference of a circle is an example of a line. Indeed, lines need not be finite in all cases; there are a few instances in the Elements where a line is not bounded, and that is usually indicated by the language. See, for example, proposition I.12.
One piece of terminology that Euclid did not mention explicitly in a definition is a phrase to indicate when a line passes through a point. That would be a "primitive" relation that could hold between a line and a point. Postulates would be included as well to give meaning to the phrase as they are in modern treatments of elementary geometry.