Global Health III: International Institutions of Global Health Policy

Comparing “SARS” vs. COVID-19 Timelines

SARS: 5 months vs. COVID-19: 2 months

Factors explaining the pandemics

Cultural norms

Exotic cuisine sub-culture of South China

High context culture

Chinese New Year (Jan. 24-30 in 2020) coinciding with cold and flu season

Political norms and institutions

Censorship of “political” criticism

Social media monitored

Complex and slow bureaucracy focused on economy

Chinese Center for Disease Control (CCDC) has little political power

*Dr. Zhong Nanshan's visit to Wuhan, Jan. 19

Globalization and China’s economic expansion

Wuhan “Milky Way” 天河 International Airport

Opened for domestic travel, 1995

Inter-Asian flights begin, 2000

✓Flights to Europe (2012) and U.S. (2014) begin

24 million passengers in 2018 (65,000/day)

Global Political Solutions?

4 forms of “intensifying planetary interconnectivity” (Steger, pp. 10-13)

✓Embodied

International travel

Disembodied

Object-extended

✓Organization-extended

Scientists

*Precautionary principle

Governments should work together to implement these recommendations

Multilateral Negotiations

Is it easy to reach an agreement involving bilateral international negotiations between parties with different interests as in the case of Beijing Jeep?

Do governments of the world share equal interest in treating public health as a public good?

Discussion: Steger, pp. 74-82; Youde, pp. 61-79; Gostin, "Global Health Institutions Reached Their Limits."

Why are the World Health Organization (WHO), International Health Regulations (IHR), and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) considered institutions of global health governance? What different roles do they play?

According to Steger, Youde, and Gostin what are the weaknesses of the WHO and IHR when confronted with pandemics of Ebola and COVID-19? Why are the contributions of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) controversial?

How can the WHO and IHR be strengthened to guard against future pandemics?

Global Health Institutions

Sovereign & “equal” nation states & interests

Developed vs. Developing

*International organizations (IO)

*United Nations

Organization of member nations

51 in 1945

193 member states + 2 observer states

Agencies with staffs of experts

*WHO (World Health Organization)

Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland

World Health Organization (WHO)

*World Health Assembly (WHA)

194 member states

Executive Board

34 health experts

Secretariat

Director-General

Director-General, Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus flanked by regional directors in Geneva, Switzerland

6 Regional Health agencies

Africa

Americas

SE Asia

Europe

Eastern Mediterranean

Western Pacific

*International Non-governmental organizations (INGO)

Médicins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders

*Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF)

International agreements of WHO member states

International Sanitary Regulations (ISR), 1951

Notifiable diseases: Cholera, plague, relapsing fever, smallpox, typhus, yellow fever

International Health Regulations (IHR), 1969

Cholera, plague, relapsing fever, smallpox, typhus, yellow fever

*International Health Regulations (IHR), 2005

All-risk approach

Non-state reports to WHO

Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)

WHO and IHR Weaknesses

World Health Organization (WHO)

World Health Assembly (WHA)

194 member states

Sovereign & “equal” nation states & interests

Capacity for action

Developed countries

15% of world population

Developing countries

Income less than $2/day

2.8 billion people

3 billion live in countryside

Pay dues

Limited funding Budget, 2018-2019 (Youde, pp. 68-69)

$956.9 million assessed dues

$3.465 billion voluntary contributions

Top-twenty voluntary contributors (nation-states, NGOs, and UN agencies)

Total world health spending, 2012 (WHO data)

$6.5 trillion 

Total world military spending, 2019

$1.868 trillion (World Bank data)

2.2% of world GDP (World Bank data)

International Health Regulations (IHR), 2005

Relies on member states for surveillance

WHO only has power to shame