From the founding of imperial China
in 221 B.C.E. until the eighteenth century the nomadic peoples of Inner
Asia posed the strongest challenge to regimes in China. The Tang dynasty
(618-907) developed effective policies to handle these competitors during
the first half of its rule. Some scholars have proposed that by adopting
strategies of appeasement Chinese dynasties normally encouraged the growth
of parasitic nomadic confederations. This was not the case in the first
half of the Tang. Using a mixture of accommodational, coercive, and defensive
strategies, the Tang kept nomads relatively divided and weak. The Tang's
policies were effective because they broke the cultural boundaries conventionally
assumed to exist between Inner Asia and China. This was possible because
a multi-ethnic society and hybrid political culture had developed in North
China after nomadic conquests in the preceding centuries.
Politically, the dynasty created a
new ideology of the "Heavenly Qaghan" that Tang emperors used to compete
with Inner Asian chiefs for the loyalty of nomads. By offering rewards,
protection, marriages, and trade, the Tang rulers won over nomadic groups
and strengthened the dynasty at the expense of competing chiefs on the
steppe. When nomads could not be controlled through peaceful means, the
Tang relied upon coercive and defensive measures. Diplomacy and subterfuge
were utilized to exploit conflicts within hostile tribes or to create alliances
to fight against them. In warfare the Tang gained parity with the militarily
adept steppe nomads by adopting the light cavalry common in Inner Asia
and recruiting skilled Chinese and non-Chinese mounted archers to serve
in their forces. The Tang's cavalry was the key to their ability to counterattack
against invaders and launch campaigns on the steppe.
Although the Tang's hybrid cultural
background played a large part in implementing these effective Inner Asian
policies, two other factors were important. One was the availability of
strong emperors and talented civil and military personnel. The other was
centralized control over the entire Chinese heartland, which gave the dynasty
the human and material resources necessary to carry out its policies.