Intermediate Answers to Exercise 10.1-3KCT logo

© 2000 by Karl Hahn



Along the x axis, the area you are interested goes from  x = 0  to  x = a.  So the total width is a. When you divide it up into n slices, you get  n/a

Return to main text









Slicing the Exponential

The diagram shows the area under the exponential sliced into three rectangles ( n = 3 ). The left-hand edge of the first rectangle is at  x = 0.  The left-hand edge of the second rectangle is at  x = a/n.  The left-hand edge of the third rectangle is at  x = 2a/n.  The pattern appears to be that the left-hand edge of the kth rectangle is at  x = (k-1)a/n

Return to main text





















Since you know that  f(x) = 2x,  and that the x for the left-hand edge of the kth rectangle is at  x = (k-1)a/n,  you can determine that the height, hk, of the kth rectangle is
   hk  =  f( (k-1)a/n )  =  2(k-1)a/n

Return to main text









Area is the base times the height. You determined that the base of every rectangle is  a/n.  And you determined that the height of the kth rectangle is  hk = 2(k-1)a/n.  So the area, Ak of the kth rectangle is

   Ak  =  (a/n) 2(k-1)a/n

Return to main text









You are going to have the summation of the rectangles' areas:
               n
   Atotal  =   å Ak
              k=1
Now you have to substitute Ak with the expression for it that you got in the previous step.
               n
   Atotal  =   å (a/n) 2(k-1)a/n
              k=1

Return to main text









Clearly the  a/n  that is in multiplied by the exponential function is constant with respect to k. So we factor that out.

                     n
   Atotal  =  (a/n)  å 2(k-1)a/n
                    k=1

Return to main text









Do you remember from algebra that
   bpq  =  (bp)q  =  (bq)p
This is the identity you need to use here. Your exponent is the product of  (k-1)  and  a/n.  So we apply that to our equation. But there are two ways of doing it. Here are both:
                     n                        n
   Atotal  =  (a/n)  å (2a/n)(k-1)  =  (a/n) å (2(k-1))a/n
                    k=1                      k-1
So which one to use? Well the first has the expression,  (2a/n),  raised to the  (k-1)  power. The significance here is that  (2a/n),  is constant with respect to the index variable, k. So if you substituted
   u  =  2a/n
You would have
                     n
   Atotal  =  (a/n)  å uk-1
                    k=1
Look familiar? You can apply the summation formula given at the beginning of the problem to this.

Return to main text









The summation formula tells you that

    n          un - 1
    å uk-1  =        
   k=1         u - 1
Stick that in for the summation in what we already have and you get
                    un - 1
   Atotal  =  (a/n)       
                    u - 1
When you substitute back the  2a/n = u,  you get
                    (2a/n)n - 1
   Atotal  =  (a/n)            
                      2a/n - 1
But now you can use that exponential identity again. Remember? It means that  (2a/n)n = 2n(a/n) = 2a.  So your final equation from this step is
                     2a - 1
   Atotal  =  (a/n)         
                    2a/n - 1

Return to main text









When you make the suggested substitution, you get

                 2a - 1
   Atotal  =  h        
                 2h - 1
You now have the limit of this as h goes to zero. But rearrange this thing just a little, and you have
                 h
   Atotal  =         (2a - 1)
              2h - 1
Do you remember from
Exponentials and Logarithms what the limit definition of natural log is?
           bh - 1
    lim            =  ln(b)
   h  > 0     h
So when you take the limit as h goes to zero of
      h
         
   2h - 1
you're going to get  1/ln(2).  So the final result is
              2a - 1
   Atotal  =        
               ln(2)

Return to main text


email me at hahn@netsrq.com