General Editors: Thomas C. Crochunis and Michael Eberle-Sinatra
VERSION 2.0 OF THIS SITE WILL BE UNVEILED AT A NEW URL ADDRESS IN THE FALL OF 2008 (Last update: April 2008)


Murch, Jerom. 'Miss Harriet Lee and Miss Sophia Lee.' British Women Playwrights around 1800. 1 December 1999. 5 pars. <http://www.etang.umontreal.ca/bwp1800/essays/murch_queen.html>


This text is excerpted from Mrs Barbauld and her Contemporaries; Sketches of Some Eminent Literary and Scientific Englishwomen (London: Longmans, Green and co., 1877) pp. 134-8.

Copyright © Contributor, 1999-2008. This essay is protected under the copyright laws of the United States and the Universal Copyright Convention. Publication (print or electronic) or commercial use of any of the copyrighted materials without direct authorization from the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.

1.

These ladies were jointly the authors of the Canterbury Tales, a work much read in Mrs. Barbauld's time, Harriet being the chief contributor. They were daughters of John Lee, an actor at Covent Garden Theatre. Soon after his death they opened a school at Belvedere House, Bath, which they carried on many years. The school had considerable repute, both in their own time and while it was conducted, after their removal, by Mrs. Broadhurst, whose husband, the Rev. Thomas Broadhurst, was well known in literary and musical circles in Bath. Sophia first appeared as an author in 1780, when she gave to the world "The Chapter of Accidents," a comedy which soon became popular. It was followed by "The Recess: a Tale of Other Times," remarkable as the first historical romance in the English language. The subject is Queen Elizabeth and Mary, Queen of Scots. A sentence in the preface is a fair specimen of the literary style of the period. "To the hearts of both sexes nature has enriched with sensibility, and experience with refinement, this tale is humbly offered; in the persuasion such will find it worthy their patronage." That the tale was popular may be inferred from the circumstance that the edition from which this is taken is the fifth; the date is 1804. Mrs. Radcliffe, another celebrated novelist, who also resided at Bath and knew the Miss Lees intimately, was a great admirer of "The Recess." Though very young at the time it was published her mind probably thus received a stimulus which led to "The Romance of the Forest" and "The Mysteries of Udolpho." Sophia Lee was likewise the author of "The Life of a Lover," and other minor works. She died at Clifton in 1824. Harriet died there in 1851, aged 94.

2. Of Harriet a little more may be said in connection with a remarkable offer of marriage from a no less celebrated man than William Godwin, after the death of his first wife, Mary Wollstonecraft. The particulars have been lately made known,by Mr. C. Kegan Paul, in a valuable addition to biographical literature, "William Godwin: His Friends and Contemporaries." In a chapter entitled "A Singular Courtship," we learn how Godwin visited Bath in 1798, met the authors of the "Canterbury Tales," specially admired the younger sister Harriet, and "immediately resolved to study her mind with a view to marriage. Though he only visited her four times, he returned to his lodgings on each occasion to make elaborate analyses of her share of the conversation in which they had discussed various books—Rousseau's, Richardson's and others, soon making up his mind to win her if possible for his wife. There are few more interesting chapters in modern biographies than this which Mr. Paul has introduced. The love letters are, as he says, unique, manifesting in a high degree the argumentative power for which the philosopher was remarkable combined with a manly tenderness that he might not have been supposed to possess. "Miss Lee herself," we are told, "was not disinclined to marriage, but feared what would be thought of it by her sister and the world." Almost persuaded to treat this objection as lightly as in reality it deserved to be treated, there remained what was to her a grave question: Were Godwin's own opinions such as would promise a happy marriage with a woman who held strongly her faith in God and the divine guidance of, the world? Throughout she certainly gave little if any encouragement, and the more earnestly the suitor defended his theological position, the more resolute the lady became in her determination to say No.
3.

Two extracts will show how these authors, who gave to the world such thrilling love stories at the close of the last and the beginning of the present centuries closed their own correspondence.

4.

William Godwin to Miss Harriet Lee, London, June, 1798.

"But I have done. I entertain no hopes of a good effect from what I now write, and merely give vent to the sentiments your determination was calculated to excite. I have made no progress with you. When you have dropped an objection it has been only afterwards to revive it; when I have begun to entertain fairer prospects, you have convinced me I was deluding myself My personal qualities, good or bad, are of no account in your eyes, you are concerned only with the articles of my creed. I am compelled to regard the affair as concluded, and the rational prospect of happiness to you and myself as something you conceive better than happiness. I have now discharged my sentiments, and here ends my censure of your mistake. If ever you be prevailed on to listen to the addresses of any other man, may his success be decided on more equitable principles than mine have been."

5.

Miss Harriet Lee to Mr. William Godwin, Bath, July, 1798.

"You distress me, sir, extremely by agitating a question which ought to be considered as decided. I had full opportunity, when in Town, to hear, and attentively to weigh your opinions concerning the point on which we most differ: for perhaps I do not fully agree with you in supposing our minds at unison on many others; but that is immaterial—the matter before us is decisive. All the powers of my understanding, and the better feelings of my heart concurred in the resolution I declared before we parted; every subsequent reflection has but confirmed it. With me our difference of opinion is not a mere theoretical question. I never did, never can feel it as such, and it is only astonishing that you should do so. It announces to me a certain difference in—I had almost said a want in—the heart, of a thousand times more consequence than all the various shades of intellect or opinion. My resolution then remains exactly and firmly what it was: it gives me great pain to have disturbed the quiet of your mind, but I cannot remedy the evil without losing the rectitude of my own."

 
Jerom Murch